Generalsuche Home Home mobil Mobil Help Hilfe Sitemap Sitemap Kontakt Kontakt Impressum Impressum Datenschutz Datenschutz RSS Feed Feeds
News / Newsletter
Veranstaltungen / Events
Publikationen / E-Library
AMS Publikationen - Forschung
FokusInfo
AMS/ABI-Praxishandbücher
AMS/ABI-Methodendatenbank
AMS/ABI-Didaktikdatenbank
AMS New Skills
AMS Vision Rundschau
E-Library - Bibliograph. Suche
E-Library - Volltext Suche
Web-Ressourcen
AMS-JobBarometer
Jobchancen Studium
Merkliste Merkliste News
Merkliste Merkliste Events
Merkliste Merkliste E-Library
Merkliste Merkliste Jobch. News
Merkliste Merkliste Methoden
 
Detailansicht E-LibraryKurztipp   
zur Suche  
  Merkliste bearbeiten / via E-Mail sendenTitel merken  
VerfasserInnen / HerausgeberInnen
AutorIn 1:Means, Barbara
AutorIn 2:Toyama, Yukie
AutorIn 3:Murphy, Robert
weitere AutorInnen:Bakia, Marianne; Jones, Karla
HerausgeberIn 1:U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development - Policy and Program Studies Service
Titel
Titel:Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning
Untertitel:A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
Auftraggeber / Auftragnehmer
Auftraggeber:U.S. Department of Education
Auftragnehmer:Center for Technology in Learning
Veröffentlichungsvermerk
Ort:Washington, D.C.
Verlag:U.S. Department of Education
Jahr:2010
Anmerkung:Revised September 2010
Abstract
Abstract:"(...) A systematic search of the research literature from 1996 through July 2008 identified more than a thousand empirical studies of online learning. Analysts screened these studies to find those that (a) contrasted an online to a face-to-face condition, (b) measured student learning outcomes, (c) used a rigorous research design, and (d) provided adequate information to calculate an effect size. As a result of this screening, 50 independent effects were identified that could be subjected to meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found that, on average, students in online learning conditions performed modestly better than those receiving face-to-face instruction. The difference between student outcomes for online and face-to-face classes?measured as the difference between treatment and control means, divided by the pooled standard deviation?was larger in those studies contrasting conditions that blended elements of online and face-to-face instruction with conditions taught entirely face-to-face. Analysts noted that these blended conditions often included additional learning time and instructional elements not received by students in control conditions. This finding suggests that the positive effects associated with blended learning should not be attributed to the media, per se. An unexpected finding was the small number of rigorous published studies contrasting online and face-to-face learning conditions for K-12 students. (...)"
Verfügbarkeit
Download: hier klicken (PDF  1,17 MB)
URL: U.S. Department of Education